A major study of modern culture, Dialectic of Enlightenment for many years led an underground existence among the homeless Left of the German Federal Republic until its definitive publication in West Germany in Originally composed by its two distinguished authors during their Californian exile in , the book can stand as a monument of classic German progressive social theory in the twentieth century.
Originally composed by its two distinguished authors during their Californian exile in , the book can stand as. Adorno continues to have an impact on disciplines as diverse as philosophy, sociology, psychology, cultural studies, musicology and literary theory.
An uncompromising critic, even as Adorno contests many of the premises of the philosophical tradition, he also reinvigorates that tradition in his concerted attempt to stem or to reverse potentially.
Theodor W. In light of two pivotal developments—the rise of fascism, which culminated in the Holocaust, and the standardization of popular culture as a commodity indispensable to contemporary capitalism—Adorno sought to evaluate and synthesize the essential insights. The range of Adorno's achievement, and the depth of his insights, is breathtaking and daunting. His work on literary, artistic, and musical forms, his devastating indictment of modern industrial society, and his profound grasp of Western culture from Homer to Hollywood have made him one of the most significant figures.
Theodor Adorno is a widely-studied figure, but most often with regard to his work on cultural theory, philosophy and aesthetics. The Sociology of Theodor Adorno provides the first thorough English-language account of Adorno's sociological thinking. Matthias Benzer reads Adorno's sociology through six major themes: the problem of conceptualising capitalist society;.
His wide-ranging authorship is significant also to continental philosophy, political theory, art criticism, and musicology. Download The Sociology Of Theodor Adorno books , Theodor Adorno is a widely-studied figure, but most often with regard to his work on cultural theory, philosophy and aesthetics.
The Sociology of Theodor Adorno provides the first thorough English-language account of Adorno's sociological thinking. Matthias Benzer reads Adorno's sociology through six major themes: the problem of conceptualising capitalist society; empirical research; theoretical analysis; social critique; the sociological text; and the question of the non-social. Benzer explains the methodological and theoretical ideas informing Adorno's reflections on sociology and illustrates Adorno's approach to examining social life, including astrology, sexual taboos and racial prejudice.
Benzer clarifies Adorno's sociology in relation to his work in other disciplines and the inspiration his sociology took from social thinkers such as Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Kracauer and Benjamin. The book raises critical questions about the viability of Adorno's sociological mode of procedure and its potential contributions and challenges to current debates in social science. Download Language And History In Theodor W Adorno S Notes To Literature books , Plass argues that Adorno's essays on literature are of prime importance for an understanding of his aesthetics because they challenge the conceptual limitations of philosophical discourse.
Adorno definiert wurde sowie auf der Frage, inwiefern die von Adorno aufgestellten Hypothesen in der heutigen Zeit noch aktuell sind. Um die Einwirkung der Kulturindustrie auf die Gesellschaft zu veranschaulichen, wird die Thematik anhand eines Modells beschrieben, das die Kulturindustrie in einen Kontext mit dem Staat, der Gesellschaft und der Kulturschaffung stellt.
Mit der Entstehung der audiovisuellen Massenmedien zu Beginn des Adornos Erziehung zur "Entbarbarisierung" hat dazu erste Versuche unternommen, sich den Gewalten in den Weg zu stellen. Danach werden die Erziehungsziele der "Entbarbarisierung" beschrieben. Wie es scheint, ist die Welt in einem Sog aus Kriegen und Gewalt gefangen und der Weg zum ewigen Frieden scheint noch lang zu sein. Dies wird einem von Adorno nicht leicht gemacht.
Adornos ideologische Grundlage war der von Hegel beeinflusste Marxismus, allerdings in seiner pessimistischen Interpretation, ohne noch die Hoffnung auf den Aufstand der Massen zu hegen. Ein Gravitationstext der kritischen Theorie unserer Zeit findet damit erstmals eine kommentierende Auslegung. Search for:. Author : Theodor W. The deviation from purely economical thinking nevertheless has its economic ground.
The object of Marxian political economy was liberalism as reality and ideology. With its advancement to an economy that indeed leaves intact the pseudo-market but otherwise depends on the powers that control production, which also determine circulation and distribution, the liberal laws of the market lose their significance; as a result so too did the economic concept of the economy.
Domination has always existed in political economy. Therefore domination no longer is of no explanatory use because of its abstractness; rather it is the form [Gestalt] into which economical reason has descended, long corroded by irrationality. Moreover, that relationship is subject to historical-materialist change, just as the Institute analyzed the transformation in capitalism from its high liberal to its late, administered phase.
In this sense Capital undertakes ideology critique of the discourse of political economy by criticizing immanently its central categories such as commodity, value, money and capital, by which society understands itself falsely. With regard to the bourgeois concept of freedom, workers are free to sell their labor-power yet, dispossessed of the means to live and the means of production, they have no choice but to sell themselves: the exchange of labor-power for a wage is both free and unfree.
So too the value of the purchased commodity labor-power is both the value of its reproduction as it is consumed and the surplus value produced from its consumption: the exchange of labor-power for a wage is both just and unjust. That is, identity-thinking in epistemology merges with the exchange- principle in economic praxis through the cognitive judging of abstract equivalents. Engster and Schlaudt First, a predicative judgment of perception amounts to the conceptual prescinding from the qualitatively particular, sensuous intuition, and can be considered a form of cognitive domination.
But second, once such a cognitive act of the understanding has been executed, the resulting judgment is available for use in syllogistic reasoning, and it is this operation that amounts to an abstract equivalence between the non- equivalent referents of those perceptual predications: the sensuous particulars or their intuitions.
Just as exchange-value, the abstraction of labor time exerted in producing a commodity, is not an inherent property of the thing but rather the socially necessary form in which objects appear under capitalism, so too identity-thinking imputes the abstract identity between non- identical particulars via the universal — the concept — under which they are subsumed.
When we criticize the exchange principle as the identifying principle of thought, we want to realize the ideal of free and just exchange. To date, this idea is only a pretense. Its realization alone would transcend exchange. If critical theory has unmasked it for what it is — an exchange of things that are equal and yet unequal — then the critique of the inequality within equality aims also at equality… if no person were denied a part of his living labor anymore, then rational identity would be achieved, and society would have transcended identity-thinking.
Adorno , , translation modified; cf. Pickford and Integration of the subjective factor. Necessity of a psychological surplus beyond the objective economy, in order to hold society together. Marxism as Critical Theory means, that it [Marxism] cannot become hypostatized, not simply philosophy. The philosophical questions are open, not predetermined by ideological world-view [Weltanschauung].
Critical Theory does not refer to totality but criticizes it. But that also means that it [Critical Theory] according to its contents is anti-totalitarian, with all political consistency. Critical Theory is no ontology, no positive materialism.
Within its concept is that the satisfaction of material needs is a necessary but not the sufficient condition of an emancipated society.
The realized materialism is at once also the abolition of materialism as the dependence on blind material interests. To go beyond the principle of exchange means at the same time to fulfill it: no one should receive less than the equivalent of the average societal labor. For Critical Theory science [Wissenschaft] is one among other societal forces of production and interwoven with the conditions of production. It itself is subject to that reification against which Critical Theory is arrayed.
This means as much as that in Critical Theory Marxism must critically reflect on itself, without it being weakened. It is irreconcilable with positivism. Positivism is a restricted form [Gestalt] of reason. Its unreason is immanently ascertainable. Critical Theory is motivated by an altered concept of reason. Against Marxism as metaphysics Critical Theory takes dialectic incomparably more seriously than established Marxism. This is valid above all for ideology. Critical Theory cannot deal with [abfertigen] the superstructure from above.
The concept of ideology, as that of societally necessary illusion, contains within itself the concept of a correct consciousness. Not all mind [Geist] is ideology. Critical Theory means immanent critique also of mind. Critical Theory is motivated by the interest in a society worthy of human beings, in this respect practical. But Critical Theory must not be measured according to praxis as a thema probandum; objectivity of truth, reason are authoritative to it.
Critical Theory does not hypostatize a unity of theory and praxis, which under the present society is not at all possible. Between theory and praxis there is no continuum. Theodor W. Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Referenced as GS volume, page. Negative Dialectics. Translated by E. New York: Continuum. Adorno, et al.
New York: Harper. Minima Moralia. London: Verso. New York: Routledge. Edited by J. Bernstein, New Left Review :
0コメント